Sampler from the Winter 2003 issue of KEYBOARD COMPANION
A feature for non-subscribers: Highlights from the print magazine

Must we memorize?

The World Around Us:
News and Views
Helen Smith Tarchalski, Editor

Clara Schumann, acknowledged as one of the first to present solo piano recitals from memory in the 19th century, probably started the controversy. Franz Liszt is more routinely identified as popularizing memorized performances (reportedly as part of his quest for "one-upsmanship" or "parlor tricks") than as a pioneer of such serious pedagogical concepts as the master class. Myra Hess, Bela Bartok, and Stanislav Richter, the latter citing his choice being "in respect for the composer," turned their backs on the tradition in the 20th century, but performing from memory still survives as our standard.

Memorizing and performing from memory are topics that elicit both fascination and fear in performers of all calibers. It is one of the most hotly debated concepts in piano pedagogy today. The topic sometimes causes strain in music teacher associations as the differing factions argue the perils or pluses of requiring memorized student performances. Performing with or without the printed score is referred to with a variety of phrases that can imply a double entendre, depending on the reader's position on the topic, including playing "without (or with) music," and "by heart."

Dozens of books dedicated to the topic (each of our writers refers to one of his or her favorites), or including large chapters on the topic, focus on all facets of the word: as an active verb "to memorize," an adverb to play "from memory," and the noun "memory." Psychologists, learning behavior specialists, and pedagogues, including the great 19th century pedagogue, Leschetizky (who proposed a revolutionary method of memorizing "in reverse," or learning one measure or small phrase at a time starting with the end and working toward the beginning), have analyzed mechanisms and techniques affecting memorization. Entire presentations on memory and memorization at music teacher conferences are usually packed with teachers searching for advice to address and solve memorization anxiety. This amount of attention to the topic indicates that memorization and memorized performance are indeed forces with which to be reckoned.

Is memorizing music helpful to the performer? Is performing from memory necessary, or should it be viewed as an unnecessary tradition and burdensome dictate from a past era? Are there occasions in which solo performers should have the option to perform with the printed score, should it always be an option, or should memorization continue to be our standard? Would eliminating memory as a standard performance requirement diminish the quality of preparation and/or the polish of performances? Our writers for this issue examine these and other aspects of memorization, memory, and performing from memory.

from Christine Mirabella's article

Is the tradition of memorized performance relevant today?

Must we memorize? Recently I had to make a decision about whether to allow one of my high school students to perform in a recital using his music. He was very comfortable performing a Scriabin prelude from memory, but his Bach prelude was not securely memorized. The recital chairman accepted the use of music, so I agreed to let him perform. Why did I feel a twinge of discomfort when he used music at the recital?

During my formative years, it was expected that all students and concert artists memorize their repertoire for public performance. Playing with the music definitely raised eyebrows. Over the years I have observed a more flexible attitude that places a secure musical experience ahead of the feat of memorization. Again, why did I feel uncomfortable when my student used his music?

What are some of the benefits of memorizing?

Developing the skill of memorization is extremely beneficial. It can enable us to better internalize the music. When we do not have the distraction of reading music and turning pages, we may have more freedom to concentrate on the interpretation and communication of our ideas. Of course, the pianist must have studied the piece in great detail and acquired a thorough understanding of the music. The student should use all the means at his/her disposal to memorize - the aural, visual, tactile, and intellectual approaches. One useful memorization concept is the mapping system developed by Rebecca Shockley in her book Mapping Music: For Faster Learning and Secure Memory. (A-R Editions, Inc., Madison. Wisconsin). . .

Christine Mirabella received her Bachelor of Music and Master of Music degrees with high distinction in Piano Performance from the Indiana University School of Music. She currently holds the position of Principal Keyboard with the Eugene Symphony Orchestra. Christine has taught as an adjunct instructor in piano and piano pedagogy at the University of Oregon. She is an MTNA nationally certified teacher and past president of the Eugene District. She continues to teach at her successful private piano studio in Eugene, Oregon

 

from Bonnie Kellert's article

Memorizing involves a multiplicity of processes

"Your assignment is to memorize and prepare this piece for performance." These words can send a music student into a state of panic. How do we prepare our students for this sometimes daunting and challenging task? How does the learning process affect the memorizing process? How can memorizing lead to a confident performance? Quotations from famous pianists to whom I shall refer are drawn from Dean Elder's book, Pianists at Play (The Instrumentalist Co., Evanston, Illinois), an especially worthwhile resource because Elder systematically asked his subjects how they memorized. Out of these comments and my own thoughts, some patterns emerge.

Memorizing and learning a composition are closely related processes. To me, memorizing involves more than merely playing a piece without the music in front of you. A previous generation called this "Playing by Heart." The music becomes a part of you, totally absorbed and internalized as well as committed to memory. When I ask my students to memorize a piece, I really have this broader idea of learning as well as playing without the score in mind. Memorizing also involves a multiplicity of processes.

Tactile (finger or muscular) memory is the capturing of patterns as a reflex and is especially useful in fast passages where higher thinking can't keep up with the details. This is developed by repetitive practice; consistent, good fingering and hand position; and is supplemented by previous scale and arpeggio practice.

Photographic memory
involves a visual concept of the written score. Rubinstein said: "My memory is mainly photographic. When I play, I turn the pages in my mind." This mechanism is facilitated by good editions with clear notation and space in the score for teacher and student markings. And Claudio Arrau commented: "I advise students who have difficulty in memorizingto use only one edition, to know exactly where things are on each page."

Auditory memory, or playing by ear, is another retention technique. And so is analytic or theoretical memory, the result of taking a composition apart and putting it back together again while being aware of, among other things, harmonic and intervallic relationships. Arrau said: "I think the most important memory is the analytic. To know exactly what is happening - repeat this phrase, retard, modulate, know from what key you are leaving and to what key you are going, know all the different voices, be able to play the left hand alone by memory." This approach, although time consuming, offers the most reliable means of remembering. . .

Bonnie Kellert, an independent piano teacher in Potomac, Maryland, regularly performs as a soloist and chamber music collaborator, gives master classes, lecture-recitals, and presentations, and frequently serves as an adjudicator. She has won numerous awards and competitions, including first prize in the Washington International Competition for Pianists, and was a semi-finalist in the William Kapell International Piano Competition.

 

from Thomas Mastroianni's article

Yes, we must memorize!

The obvious answer to the question, "Must we memorize?" is "Yes." We would hardly impute learning to that which could not be remembered. In his book Memory and Brain (Oxford Press, New York), Larry Squire explains that "learning is the process of acquiring new information, while memory refers to the persistence of learning in a state that can be revealed at a later time. Memory is the usual consequence of learning." Learning without memory is rather useless.

But must we play without the score in public?

Perhaps another question that students and teachers would find practical is, "Must we play without the score in public?" It is best to begin by answering this question with a "No" and then probe to understand if there is any advantage in playing without the score in public.

In the first place, what is the score? The score is not the music any more than a recipe is the meal. When we are hungry we don't eat a cookbook. The score is a set of visual cues that stand for musical concepts which the performer must bring to life through sound. The sound is the music. Does it help to have these visual cues on stage to consult while performing? Perhaps for some performers it does help. Ensemble participants such as chamber music players, oratorio singers, and symphony players regularly consult the score while performing. Many soloists find the score distracting and inconvenient to watch while rendering highly complex muscular and aural responses that sometimes require almost superhuman focus and attention. Even players who bring the score to the stage often do not stare at it the whole time, but basically have it learned so that a glance here and there is all that is needed . . .

Thomas Mastroianni is known for his performances and teaching on four continents. He is co-founder of the Amalfi Coast Music Festival and President of the American Liszt Society. He served as chairman of piano and applied music at Texas Tech University, and Dean of Music, Chairman of Piano and Professor at The Catholic University of America, where he currently teaches as Professor Emeritus. He is a 1992 recipient of the Medal of the Hungarian Liszt Society. He frequently lectures on a variety of topics, and has published several articles on wellness for the performing musician, performance anxiety, and memory.


For the other Samplers from this issue

For subscription information,